beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.01.26 2017가합567424

손해배상(국)

Text

1. The Defendant: 21,538,461 won to Plaintiff A; 10,000,000 won to Plaintiff B; 7,000,000 won to Plaintiff C; and 16,538.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On February 28, 1994, Plaintiff A and D were indicted for violating the National Security Act as shown in the separate facts charged, and the Seoul District Criminal Court rendered a judgment that found all the facts charged against Plaintiff A guilty and sentenced to seven years of imprisonment and suspension of qualification and seven years of additional collection, and 6,240,000 won. Of the facts charged against Plaintiff D, the remaining facts charged are not guilty, and the remaining facts charged are found guilty, and the judgment of the court below that acquitted Plaintiff A, D and C with three years of imprisonment and suspension of qualification and three years of additional collection, 3,315,00 won and 3 years of additional collection, 3,319, 300 won and 4 years of additional collection (9), and the Seoul Criminal Court reversed the judgment of the court below on July 7, 1994, the suspension of qualifications and 3 years of additional collection against Plaintiff D, 40 years of imprisonment and 40 years of additional collection, and 30 years of additional collection and collection as to Plaintiff D and 4 years of suspension of qualifications and 20.

3) Accordingly, Plaintiff A, D, and Prosecutor appealed. On October 25, 1994, the Supreme Court dismissed both Plaintiff A, D, and Prosecutor’s appeals (No. 94Do2181) and the instant judgment subject to a retrial became final and conclusive as is, the instant judgment subject to a retrial became final and conclusive (No. 94Do2181). 4) On September 30, 1997, Plaintiff A released the Plaintiff from office on February 28, 1994, for which the suspended sentence was rendered.

5 On April 7, 2014, Plaintiff A and D filed a petition for review of the instant judgment subject to a retrial with Seoul High Court Decision 2014No26, the Seoul High Court. The said court held that Plaintiff A and D filed a petition for a review of the instant judgment subject to a retrial on August 11, 2014, “Plaintiff A and D, on September 8, 1993, hereinafter referred to as “draft donation”).

On September 10, 1993, 19:10 on September 10, 1993, and 9:30 on September 10, 1993 for Plaintiff A.

참조조문