2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

A. (1) Plaintiff A is a student who was enrolled in the second grade of C Middle School located in Daejeon-gu around 201, and Plaintiff B is the mother of Plaintiff A. 2) The Defendant establishes and operates C Middle School and D Middle School (hereinafter referred to as “instant school”).

B. The instant harmful act 1) E, F, G, H, I, J, K, etc. received a protective disposition in the Daejeon Family Court as shown in the attached Table 1 [Attachment 1] on all or part of the criminal facts as indicated in the attached Form 1 (hereinafter “instant harmful act”), and individually “the instant harmful act” in the order of each paragraph.

(3) On March 5, 2013, the name and disposition date of the case number: (a) the care and custody entrustment, attendance order, community service, long-term probation, etc. of the guardian on July 9, 2013; (b) G 2012 Pu3458, including the care and custody entrustment, the short-term probation; (c) the care and custody entrustment, the attendance order, the short-term probation, etc. of the guardian’s care organization on March 5, 2013; and (d) the details of the protective custody order, including the care and custody entrustment, the education order, the short-term probation, etc., on March 5, 2013; and (d) the details of the order of care and custody entrusted by the guardian on March 5, 2012 Pu2129; (e) the details of the order of care and custody entrusted by the guardian on March 21, 2013; and (e) the details of the order of care and custody entrusted by the guardian on March 315, 2013

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 4, 5, 6 (including branch numbers in case of provisional number; hereinafter the same shall apply), Gap evidence Nos. 13-1 through 4, 6 through 9, and Gap evidence Nos. 18, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion

A. Plaintiff A caused the instant harmful act five times from October 201 to January 19, 201 by the instant school student.