A. Around 15:00 on August 6, 2016, an accident occurred in which the Appointer C was in progress near the Defendant’s business site located in Geum-gu, Busan, and the Defendant was infinite with his own mar and the Appointor C, leading up to his mar to his mar and the Appointor C.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). (b)

In the instant accident, the designated parties C suffered from the fear of being missing in detail in the light of the presidential body of the presidential body of the presidential body of the presidential body.

C. The plaintiff is the son C's children, and the observer D is the husband of the selected C.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3 and 6, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above fact of recognition of liability for damages, the Defendant is liable for damages caused by the instant accident in accordance with Article 759(1) of the Civil Act, since the instant accident occurred due to negligence in violation of such obligation, although it was an occupant of fat, who is obligated to manage the said dog to prevent harm to others.

The Defendant asserted that the Defendant’s medical dog’s medical dog did not go to the Appointer C, but the Defendant prepared and delivered a letter to the effect that, after the instant accident, the Defendant suffered injury due to the Defendant’s medical dog and compensate for all damages arising therefrom, the Defendant paid KRW 5,00,00 as the medical expenses, etc. of the Appointer C after the instant accident, it can be sufficiently recognized that the medical dog owned by the Defendant did not go to the Appointer C, and that the instant accident occurred beyond the Appointer C, and thus, the Defendant’s assertion on a different premise cannot be accepted.

다만, 피고 소유 진돗개가 선정자 C를 물거나 할퀸 것으로 보이지 않고,...