On October 27, 2003, the compulsory auction procedure for each real estate (hereinafter “instant real estate”) listed in the separate list, which is the Defendant’s fundamental property, was commenced on October 27, 2003, in relation to the real estate (hereinafter “instant real estate”). The above court decided to permit the sale of the instant real estate to E who is the highest bidder on April 28, 2008 without any separate permission as to the closure of the school against the Defendant and the disposition to dissolve the school juristic person, and E completed the ownership transfer registration due to the sale by compulsory auction (hereinafter “instant ownership transfer registration”).

The Defendant filed a lawsuit against E seeking the cancellation of the ownership transfer registration in Seoul Central District Court Decision 2008Gahap68376, and won the lawsuit. However, the Seoul High Court Decision 2009Na23476, the appellate court of the lawsuit, accepted E’s appeal and was pronounced dismissed.

On November 209, G, the president F and the secretary general, the Defendant’s representative, delegated the Plaintiff with the power of attorney concerning the final appeal of Seoul High Court case No. 2009Na23476 (hereinafter “instant final appeal”), and entered into a delegation contract (hereinafter “first delegation contract”) with the effect that the Plaintiff will pay 15 billion won (excluding value-added tax) upon winning the entire contract with the contingent fee, and that the Plaintiff will pay 1 billion won (excluding value-added tax) when winning the contract with the contingent fee (hereinafter “first delegation contract”).

The plaintiff performed a litigation in the final appeal of this case in accordance with the first delegation contract, and the Supreme Court on April 8, 2010, is dissolved upon the dissolution order of the school juristic person, and is a school juristic person in fact subject to the closure order of the school.