beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2015.07.09 2015고정779

상해

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On the 15:00 on the face of India, the Defendant, on the 15:00 on the 23th floor of the Dindo Governor building, referred to as "whether or not the victim E has been damaged during working hours," and had a dispute with the victim and his desire to take into account the fact that the ordinary defendant neglected to work.

Accordingly, the defendant, who is in harmony, has both arms carried the body of the victim and left the body of the victim.

In addition, as soon as possible, the suspension of the victim's left hand is broken, the victim's left hand is taken several times, and the victim's face is taken several times in drinking.

The defendant continued to be faced with the wall by taking the head of the victim's knife by hand, and the victim's head was knife with the chair for office work in the third floor building.

Due to such violence of the defendant, the victim escaped to the first floor office, and the defendant went away from the victim.

On the other hand, the defendant continued to gather the awareness of office work in the office of the first floor and had his head.

When the victim runs away from the company building, and the defendant runs away from the company building.

On the other hand, the Defendant continued to gather the stones of the company mast and had been the victim.

Therefore, the defendant assaulted the victim and inflicted an injury on the days of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police suspect interrogation protocol regarding E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes stated in a written diagnosis;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of fines, the choice of fines - The details of occurrence of the instant case and the balance of sentencing with the victim, shall be determined in consideration of all the circumstances;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the custody of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.