If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

1. On March 27, 2015, the Defendant forged a private document: (a) was in C in Busan Jin-gu, Busan.

LG Plus direct management agency: (a) entered “D” in the subscriber column, “E” in the date of birth, and “LE34” in the item column; (b) entered the applicant column as “D” in the applicant column and signed on the name next to the applicant column.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a new application for joining a mobile phone in the name of D, a private document related to rights and obligations.

2. On March 28, 2015, the Defendant: (a) sent the forged mobile phone new application form to the staff in charge of the opening of the headquarters of LG Plus Co., Ltd. at the same place as above at the same time; and (b) sent the forged mobile phone application form by facsimile as if the document was duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D;

1. Relevant Article 234 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime (the point of Article 234 of the Private Document), Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act (the point of uttering of the above investigation document), and the selection of fines, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;