However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On February 11, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 00:20 on February 11, 2017, 2017, the Defendant destroyed the convenience of the above entrance to repair KRW 2.50,000 by walking the entrance of the above room on the ground that the victim D operated in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government “E” before the scene of “E”, the victim does not open the door.

"2017 Highest 2189"

1. On February 4, 2017, the Defendant: (a) within the “HPC room” operated by the victim G with the victim G on the level of approximately 16:45, 16:45, in Bupyeong-si, Seocheon-gu, Won-si, Seoul; (b) the Defendant appealed from the game in the above room and demanded compensation to the above PC room employees; (c) the Defendant was rejected; (d) the Defendant was dismissed; and (d) the Defendant discarded “the Chewing homicide.”

It has not lost, and it has been discovered that it has been caused by death.

“Along with sound, the victim interfered with the victim’s PC operation by force by cutting the computer table and cutting the two computers beyond the upper floor of the upper locking the two computers for about 10 minutes, such as attaching two computers, and preventing customers from accessing the said PC.

2. The Defendant, at the time, at the place specified in paragraph 1, destroyed the two computers owned by the victim G by putting in two hand two computers, which were owned by the victim G, into the floor and destroying them for approximately KRW 80,000,000 as repair costs.

Summary of Evidence

[2017 Highest 1315]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Non-afforestation photographs of damaged parts;

1. Investigation report (to hear statements by victim D phone);

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. G statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to field photographs, internal investigation reports (on-site conditions, statements by the suspect and reporting person, and attachment of photographs);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor, respectively, for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 of the Criminal Act: