beta
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.06.01 2017누41353

부당인사및부당노동행위구제재심판정취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including the part arising from the supplementary participation.

Reasons

1. The court's explanation concerning this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, the court's explanation concerning this case is acceptable as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420

(1) The court of first instance that rejected the plaintiff's claim on February 2, 201 is justifiable, and the judgment of the court of first instance that rejected the plaintiff's claim on the ground that the plaintiff's claim is justifiable, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion. Thus, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent that the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.