However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

The Defendant is a person who operates a sexual traffic business of approximately 43 square meters with a shower room and three marina rooms in the name of “D” in the Gyeonggi-gu Government of the Republic of Korea C and the third floor.

On July 16, 2014, the Defendant received a charge of KRW 100,00 from E, who was found to be a customer, and provided shower facilities and showers to the said customer, and arranged to enter the said room to engage in sexual traffic. From November 7, 2013 to July 16, 2014, the Defendant received a charge from an unspecified number of customers from the said method and arranged to engage in sexual traffic, thereby gaining approximately KRW 9,63,00,00.

Accordingly, the defendant committed commercial sex acts such as arranging commercial sex acts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. A investigation report (verification of profits from sexual traffic and property subject to a request for preservation of additional collection);

1. On-site photographs;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to credit card collection inquiry;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and the Selection of Imprisonment with labor concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;

1. The reasoning for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is [the scope of recommendation] The basic area (6 to 14 months) of the second category (6 to 14 months) including the brokerage, etc. of sexual traffic crimes subject to 19 years of age or older, [the decision of sentence] [the defendant, who has been sentenced to a fine for the same kind of crime, 4 months of imprisonment with prison labor, 2 years of suspended sentence, again commits the crime of this case even though he had the record of being sentenced to a fine for the same crime, i.e., gains acquired by the crime, the circumstances of the crime, and the fact that he/she seems to have closed the business. It is so decided as per Disposition