2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. On August 19, 201, the Plaintiff leased from the Defendants the lease deposit amount of KRW 50,000,000, monthly rent of KRW 4,000, and the period of KRW 4,000, and the period of KRW 385,00,00 from among the buildings owned by the Defendants No. 3 of Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Non-Party 1 (hereinafter “instant building”). From around that time, the Plaintiff operated the party funeral business in the instant building. Since that time, the said lease was extended thereafter.

B. On August 29, 2014, the Plaintiff drafted a lease agreement with the Defendants, which provides that the term of the lease contract shall be two years; the deposit shall be KRW 50,000,000 for the lease deposit; the monthly rent shall be KRW 4,200,00 for one year thereafter; the entrance shall be 4,50,000 for one year thereafter; and the subsequent entrance shall be an exclusive passage for the billiard, so the lessee shall be responsible for the management and repair thereof (Article 11); for the use of the parking lot, the number of free parking lots that the lessee can use in principle as a narrow relationship with the lessor (Article 12).

C. Meanwhile, on the grounds of the Plaintiff’s delinquency in rent, the Defendants filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff for delivery of the instant building with Seoul Central District Court 2016Kadan27793, and on June 24, 2016, the conciliation was concluded with the effect that “the Plaintiff shall deliver the instant building to the Defendant by June 30, 2016 after all of the facilities installed in the instant building was removed,” and accordingly, the Plaintiff transferred the instant building to the Defendant around that time.

[Grounds for Recognition: Entry of Evidence Nos. 1 through 2-3, 3-3, and 4-3, the purport of the whole pleadings]

2. The Plaintiff asserted around August 16, 201, paid 140,000,000 won to the previous lessee for the premium, and had been engaged in the business after receiving the right to run the instant party funeral business. The Defendants installed structures, such as a parking-prohibited sign and a iron blocker, at the entrance of the instant party funeral from August 2014, when they are the exclusive passage for access to the instant party funeral, and have access to the customers using the party funeral.