However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On September 26, 2015, at around 11:30 on September 26, 2015, the Defendant: (a) taken off the victim D’s house located in Gyeonggi-si, Gyeonggi-si; (b) KRW 2,000,00 in the total market price of the victim’s house owned by the rapid line; (c) KRW 100,000,000,000 in the total market price of the victim’s house owned by the rapid line; (d) KRW 2,50,000 in the pande; (d) KRW 4,00 in the female panty; and (e) KRW 1,00,00 in the inner clothes; (e) around October 20, 2015, the Defendant: (e) brought about a theft of intrusion upon residence by taking advantage of the victim’s house’s gate not locked; and (e) brought about a theft of KRW 301,000,00 in the market price of the victim.

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Each statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as photographs of damaged articles, pictures of the place of crime assessed by the suspect;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act (a point of Section 329, a choice of imprisonment), and Article 330 of the Criminal Act (a point of larceny by intrusion at night) concerning the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act under the suspended execution is that the nature of the crime in light of the time, method, frequency, and motive of the crime in this case

subsection (b) of this section.

The defendant has the same criminal history.

However, the defendant is divided into a crime with a intellectual disability of third degree, and the defendant's parents prevent recidivism.

Some of the damage occurred and agreed with victims.

The above circumstances and the defendant's age, sex, environment, academic background, occupation and career, health status, family relationship, details of the crime, and circumstances after the crime shall be comprehensively considered in determining the punishment as ordered.