beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2013.09.24 2013고정354

업무방해등

Text

Defendant

A, Defendant B, and Defendant D shall be punished by a fine of 2,00,000 won, and Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of 1,00,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A The representative of G, Defendant B planned to take over “M” construction sites by investing in L real estate development enterprises located in Ansan-gu, Y202 H202, Defendant C, Defendant C, and Defendant D, as the J of Earsena Corporation, and Defendant D, as the representative of Earsen Corporation, and the person who planned to take over “M” construction sites.

Defendant

A, in the case of the construction of a new building of the building in Seo-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Ma, a construction company for the construction of a new building, received a subcontract for the part on the leased of materials, but it was impossible to collect rent due to the default of Hanmi Construction. On July 16, 2012, there was a fact that Defendant D and Defendant B, known at ordinary times around July 16, 2012, who requested expenses related to the above construction site. Defendant C requested Defendant A to assist in the lien-related work, and agreed to participate in the above lien-related work at the site, and the Defendants were also forced to occupy the above “M” construction site and planned to exercise

However, from August 22, 2011, in the above site, the victim N (39 years of age) occupied container offices, etc. in the above site, exercised legitimate lien, and at the same time, managed facilities and objects owned by the aboveO with legitimate delegation from the aboveO, and performed management supervision of the construction site in order to prevent safety accidents, etc. in the above construction site.

Accordingly, at around 08:30 on July 16, 2012, the Defendants mobilized approximately seven employees of security service companies and service employees to take away the victim N’s right at the construction site and secure their right of retention, and forced the victim N to use the entrance door of container office that he/she had exercised the right of retention in order to enter the above container office in the order of two hours in the manner of avoiding disturbance at the construction site.