사해행위취소
1.(a)
Defendant D Co., Ltd. is about the amount of KRW 83,408,850 to Plaintiff A, and the amount of KRW 23,153,196 to Plaintiff B and each of them.
1. Claim against Defendant D and E
A. As to the cause of the claim, Defendant D delayed payment of the wages and retirement allowances of KRW 23,153,196 to the Plaintiff B, who had worked for the Plaintiff from February 1, 2013 to April 30, 2016, and Defendant D delayed payment of KRW 18,159,56, including wages and retirement allowances, to the Plaintiff C who had worked for the period from April 1, 2013 to July 12, 2015, and there is no dispute between the parties concerned about the overdue payment of KRW 18,159,56, including wages and retirement allowances, and the overall purport of the arguments and evidence Nos. 1 and 5 of the evidence Nos. 1 and 5 of the evidence No. 1 and the whole purport of the arguments are as follows; Defendant D’s fact-finding can be acknowledged without any further proceeding to the Plaintiff A, who had worked for the period from May 1, 2014 to January 26, 2016.
Thus, Defendant D is obligated to pay to Plaintiff A delay damages calculated at the rate of 15% per annum under the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings, etc. sought by the Plaintiff from March 28, 2017 to the date of full payment, which is the amount of KRW 83,408,850, KRW 23,153,196, and each of the above amounts from March 28, 2017, after the delivery of the copy of the complaint of this case sought by the Plaintiff, and Defendant E is obligated to pay to Plaintiff C delay damages calculated at the rate of 15% per annum under the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings, etc. sought by the Plaintiff from March 28, 2017 to the date of full payment.
B. Defendant D’s assertion is asserted to the effect that since Defendant D deposited KRW 37.7 million with Plaintiff A, it should be deducted from the amount that Defendant D should pay to Plaintiff A. Thus, according to Defendant D’s representative G’s statement on the evidence No. 5, due to the fact that Defendant D’s delayed payment of wages and retirement allowances against Plaintiff A, Seoul Southern District Court 2017 Godan54, May 54, 201.