1. On November 3, 2013, from around 13:06 to 16:00 of the same day, the Defendant was engaged in the “EPC bank” operated by the victim D located in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, as if he would pay the cost of using a computer, and was allocated one computer from F as an employee.

However, even if the defendant uses the computer, he did not have the intention or ability to pay the price.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, acquired pecuniary benefits equivalent to KRW 4,000 from the victim’s computer use cost for three hours.

2. On November 3, 2013, from around 23:35, to around 07:00 on the following day, the Defendant was engaged in the said “EPC bank” operated by the victim under paragraph (1) as if he would pay the cost of using a computer, and was allocated one computer from the employee F.

However, even if the defendant uses the computer, he did not have the intention or ability to pay the price.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, acquired financial benefits equivalent to KRW 9,100,00 of the cost of using a computer for 7 hours and 30 minutes from the victim.

3. Around 20:00 on November 3, 2013, the Defendant, at the main point of “I” operated by the victim H in the third floor of Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G, sent an attitude that he/she seems to pay to J as an employee, and ordered alcohol, alcohol, and alcohol.

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the price even if he was provided with alcoholic beverage and alcoholic beverage.

The Defendant, as seen above, got the victim into deception and was provided by the victim with an amount equivalent to 37,50 won at the market price, such as the small-scale two branches of weeks, in the face of the victim.

4. On November 4, 2013, at around 20:00, the Defendant showed the attitude that the victim L, operated by Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government K, would have paid the victim the price to the victim, and ordered alcohol, alcohol, and alcohol.

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the price even if he was provided with alcoholic beverage and alcoholic beverage.

The Defendant above.