beta
(영문) 춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2018.05.09 2017가단35836

손해배상(국)

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a person who, around December 16, 2013, operated the game room (hereinafter “instant game room”) with the trade name “C” from B and C at the same time in the same year.

나. 동해경찰서 소속 경찰관들은 2013. 12. 16. 이 사건 게임장에서 그 장소에 설치되어 있던 드레곤레어2 게임기 50대(이하 ‘이 사건 게임기’라 한다)에 속칭 ‘똑딱이’라 불리는 게임자동진행장치를 올려 놓아 별도의 조작 없이 게임이 진행되도록 한 사실 을 확인하고 동행했던 게임물등급위원회 소속 조사관으로부터 게임기 개변조에 해당한다는 확인을 받은 후 이 사건 게임기를 긴급압수하고, 다음날 이 법원으로부터 사후영장을 발부받았다.

C. On June 12, 2014, the prosecutor D of the Chuncheon District Prosecutors’ Office: (a) provided game products with contents different from those classified by the Game Industry Management Committee for the distribution or use, or display or keep for such purpose; (b) provided that the Defendant (referring to the Plaintiff in this case) provided game products with contents different from those classified by the said Committee for the use of the game products on the external route using the external storage device, not the hard disc, from December 13, 2013 to December 16, 2013; and (c) provided the game products with contents different from the rating by allowing free gifts to be released through a simple operation using the automatic system, irrespective of the user’s ability, thereby violating Article 45 subparag. 4 and Article 32(1)2 of the Game Industry Promotion Act.”

On August 8, 2014, the said court classified the “providing game products for use different from the contents of the rating” under Article 32(1)2 of the Game Industry Promotion Act.