Of the facts charged of this case, the prosecution against intimidation is dismissed.

On August 27, 2014, the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for six months by obstructing the execution of official duties in the Busan District Court, and the same year.

9. 4. The ruling has become final and conclusive and is currently in the grace period, obstructing the performance of official duties or committing crimes of violence shall be more than 11 times.

Criminal facts

The Defendant, at around 19:20 on February 27, 2016, was prevented from performing a threatening act against F by the police officer of G police station H police station, who was called out after receiving a report from F 112 before “E” located in Busan District, Busan District Court D, and the Defendant was prevented from performing a threatening act against F.

Doese, whether the police is in the line of duty, and if the police is the police;

I am I am kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn's face and h't kn't kn't kn't kn's face and h't kn't k'.

The Defendant continued to use the victim's eye and stop by "Nice police camp, police kis, snow blick," and assaulted the victim's eye by inserting it into a knife in the victim's entrance.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by the police officer on the handling of the reported case, and at the same time, failed to identify the number of days of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Each police statement made to J, F, I, and K;

1. Attachment of a photograph of the upper part of the damaged police officer;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (Attachment to a statement of opinion);

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties, the choice of imprisonment), and Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of harm and the choice of imprisonment with labor);

1. The reasons for sentencing under Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Code are as follows: (a) the Defendant did not know even though he was under suspension of execution due to the same kind of crime; and (b) the Defendant committed each of the crimes in this case.