2. Determination

A. It is recognized that the Defendant led to confession and reflects the instant crime.

B. However, in full view of not only the defendant had been punished several times for the same crime, but also the fact that the defendant repeatedly committed the crime of this case during the repeated crime period for the same crime, the total amount of damage, the total amount of damage did not have been agreed with the victims, and the payment of damage was not made at all, and there was no special change in circumstances after the decision of the court below was made, and other various circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing specified in the argument of this case, including the defendant's age, criminal background, and circumstances after the crime, even if considering the above favorable circumstances of the defendant, the court below's punishment is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.