A. The Defendant, as stated in the first instance judgment, did not inflict an injury on the victim.

B. Sentencing 1 Sentencing 200,000,000 won, which is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. In full view of the circumstances that can be recognized by comprehensively taking account of the victim’s statement and the evidence duly adopted and examined by the first instance court as to the assertion of mistake of facts, namely, the background leading up to the Defendant’s report, the form of the case site, the victim’s situation, etc., the Defendant may fully recognize the fact that the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim as stated in the judgment of the

Therefore, there is no error of misunderstanding the facts as to the crime of injury in the first instance court which made the above judgment, and the defendant's assertion as to this is without merit.

B. In full view of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant committed the instant crime; (b) the circumstances after the Defendant committed the instant crime; and (c) the degree of damage; and (d) other various circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing as indicated in the records, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, family relationship; and (b) the sentencing of the Defendant is too unreasonable since the first deliberation of the sentencing of the Defendant is too large; and (c) the Defendant’s allegation of the sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit.