2. Although there are favorable circumstances for the Defendant to the effect that all of the instant crimes were led to confessions and reflects by all of the instant crimes, the lower court’s punishment is unreasonable, taking into account the following factors: (a) the victims of the instant crimes were not only majority of the victims; (b) the victims did not fully recover from damage; and (c) the fact that repeated commission of the instant crime was committed during a hidden period after the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the crime;

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

(However, in accordance with Article 25 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the last sentence of paragraph (3) of the criminal facts in the judgment of the court below shall be corrected to "the remittance received on the same day".