beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.11.24 2014가단5331554

손해배상(기)

Text

1. Defendant B’s KRW 20,000,000 as well as 5% per annum from May 8, 2012 to November 24, 2017 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. In around the end of 2007, the Plaintiff was conducting an experiment that expands semiconductor stuffs used for the production of semiconductors with several thicknesss during the doctorate course in the U.S., and conducted a study on the control of semiconductor ruptures (hereinafter “the instant research”) with Nonparty D by conducting theoretical studies through existing textbooks or papers related to the rupture growth and control principles with Nonparty D, and collecting sampling.

B. At around 2010, the Plaintiff, majoring in mechanical engineering related to MFS and semiconductor process in the U.S., obtained doctorate as a thesis, and worked as a special faculty member of the G Research Institute affiliated with the FJ from January 1, 2010 to May 2012, the Plaintiff took overall charge of the instant research with the support of D professors, etc. of the said university and the physical department, Defendant C, and I institutions.

C. From around 2002 to 2012, Defendant C served as a professor of the physical department of F University and carried out research related to space telecom.

From March 2010 to April 2012, Defendant B, as a leader, was affiliated with the “J” of Defendant C, a professor of the F Water Department, as a guidance professor in the process of the F University graduate school and doctoral degree integration. From March 2010 to April 201, Defendant B supported the Plaintiff’s “H Team” as the team leader of the “H Team” at which the Plaintiff was the head of the team.

E. From December 2010, the Plaintiff prepared a thesis to arrange the results of the instant research from around 201 to around 201, and submitted it to the Nure, a professional scientific research area, and the above paper was published in the name of "KL" in the name of "K date." The Plaintiff was the first author and the associates, Defendant C was the second author, Defendant C was the third author and the associates.

F. However, Defendant B received specific instructions and conditions for the instant research from the Plaintiff and received them accordingly.