At around 22:30 on October 14, 2018, the Defendant: (a) 22:30, at the 1st floor of the Busan Detention House (22 years of age) located in the School of the Busan Detention House, the victim C (22 years of age) was plucked in the direction of the victim, etc. for the reason that the victim C (22 years of age) was aware of the mind that he was suffering from the mind that he raised the eyebrow, and (b) from around that time to October 17, 2018, the Defendant inflicted on the victim’s 10 times in the direction of the victim’s fingers, excluding the finger hand of the victim each day from around 200 to October 17, 2018.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning suspect examination of D;

1. Statement of each police statement related to C and D;

1. Investigation reports (C's use of violence, victim photographs and medical records), investigation reports (C's use of violence, victim photographs), investigation reports (C's medical records);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (C's opinion);

1. The fact that the defendant was detained as the same kind of crime for the pertinent provision of criminal facts, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act for the choice of punishment, and that the defendant committed a criminal act in the next detention house without any reflecting the fact that the appellate court is currently proceeding, is disadvantageous to the defendant.

However, considering the circumstances favorable to the defendant that the defendant does not want the punishment of the defendant in agreement with the victim, and that the mother of the defendant is leading the defendant after the mother of the defendant.

[However, it is difficult to believe, in light of the records of the previous investigation records, the circumstances of the crime in the judgment as stated in the written application (104 pages) submitted by C]. Other factors such as the Defendant’s age, character, conduct and environment, motive and background leading to the instant crime, means and consequence, circumstances after the instant crime, and other factors of sentencing as stated in the argument of this case shall be determined as ordered.