For the reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court convicted the victim BH of the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (hereinafter referred to as the "Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes"), the victim E, the fraudulent act against the victim E, the forgery of private documents, and the use of the

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err in its judgment by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the establishment of a crime of violation of Article 3(1)1 of the Specific Economic Crimes Act, the relation between deception and disposal act, the establishment of fraud, the intent of deception and deception, the degree of proof in criminal proceedings, the crime of forging private documents, and the establishment of a crime of larceny in the said document, etc.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.