2. In light of the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below, the following facts are found: (a) the defendant committed the crime of gambling opening in this case during the period specified in the facts constituting the crime in the judgment below; (b) the defendant led to confession and reflects the defendant; and (c) the defendant has no criminal records of the same kind; (c) on the other hand, the defendant appears to have been in charge of the crime in this case; (d) the period of the opening of the instant gambling and the amount of money provided for gambling is considerable; and (e) the defendant was punished by a suspended sentence or a fine for imprisonment for more than 10 times prior to the instant case; and (e) the instant crime was committed during the suspended sentence period; and (e) the defendant committed the crime in this case, and all the circumstances surrounding the sentencing conditions indicated in the records, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, the circumstances and contents leading to the instant crime, and the circumstances after the crime

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.