Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

The reasoning for the court's reasoning for this case is as follows: "At the time of the agreement on April 1, 2016 of the judgment of the court of first instance, the amount the plaintiff pays to the defendant via D, E, etc. at the time of the agreement of April 1, 2016 of the judgment of the court of first instance was agreed upon between the debtor under the contract for supply of ready-mixed and the creditor under the contract of first instance and the plaintiff as joint and several surety of the defendant under the above contract of first instance to meet the obligation to pay ready-mixed to the defendant Eul under the above contract of first instance, and the plaintiff paid money in excess of the above ready-mixed price to the defendant under the above contract of first and fourth, the witness I rejected the defendant's partial testimony of the first court of first instance under the contract for supply of ready-mixed and the first court of first instance (the witness I signed at the court of first instance without confirming the contents of Eul evidence 2-1 of the judgment of the court of first instance, and it is now understood that the witness's testimony is not accepted."