2. In full view of the following circumstances: (a) the instant crime was committed solely on the ground that the victim sees the Defendant as bad; (b) the victim used a brupt violence against the victim who has a visual disorder on the ground that “the victim sees the Defendant as bad; (c) the victim sees the horses from the victim, and continues to stop the assault; (d) the nature of the crime is very poor and potential for criticism; and (e) the victim did not take measures to compensate for damages up to the trial; and (e) the victim requested the Defendant to punish the Defendant; and (e) the Defendant’s age, happiness environment, etc., the Defendant’s argument cannot be accepted, even if the Defendant deposited KRW 70,00 for the victims, considering that the Defendant’s deposit in the trial room, the lower court’s punishment cannot be deemed unfair

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition.