beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.07.07 2014구합58137

손실보상금

Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 15,11,00 for the Plaintiff and its related KRW 5% per annum from March 19, 2014 to November 20, 2015.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

(a) Project name and public announcement 1) Project name: The public announcement of the river project (B improvement project) 2: The defendant;

B. Subject to expropriation by the Central Land Expropriation Committee on January 23, 2014: D 2,506 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”) in Echeon-si.

(2) From March 18, 2014: The unit price (unit: unit price) applicable to the current status of land category (unit: 16,400,494,400 610 2,610 34,950 21,319,50 31,890 paddy-gu, 249,750 472,750 472,027,500 2,506 493,841,403 compensation for losses: 493,841,403: 493,841,400 610 61,50 610 61,890 249,750 -

C. The Central Land Tribunal rendered an objection on August 21, 2014 (hereinafter “instant objection”) 1: 500,704,600 won (hereinafter “adjudication”)

(B) An appraisal corporation: A value (unit: 2,500 21,655,000 35,655,000 31,890 YY 253,578,548,000 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,50650 506,704,600 2,506 504,600 2,506 506,704,60 2): An appraisal corporation dialogue and an appraisal corporation;

(d) The unit price (unit: unit: 86,100 516,60 26,602 610 61,890 36,80 492,80 492,912,00 2,515,60 515,00 515,60 515,00 515,815,60 515,00 2,515,60 2,515,00 2,50 492,912,00 2,500 2,515,815,60 / [based] 15,20 / 515,00 / 515,20 / 11,20 / 1,20 / 1,220 / 1,20 /

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the compensation for the instant land was not properly made. As such, the Defendant should additionally pay to the Plaintiff the difference between the compensation for losses and the compensation for losses as set forth in the instant judgment based on the court’s appraisal.

(b) judgment;