However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On September 5, 2015, the Defendant destroyed the instant vending machine by gathering money from the victim E-management vending machines installed at this point for the purpose of the coffee e-mail, on the street, around 03:30 on September 5, 2015, the Defendant destroyed that approximately KRW 1,405,600 of the repair cost by taking advantage of the said vending machine, on the ground that coffee does not go to the vending machine installed at this point, but it did not go to the coffee.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and damaged the victim's property.

2. On September 7, 2015, the Defendant interfered with his/her duties, at the “H” convenience store where the victim G was working in Sinposi F on September 7, 2015, the Defendant: (a) rans the owner; and (b) rans the victim into a boat in Sinposi.

It is so big that the friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend, and friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend fri

“Along with the 25 minutes of the disturbance, the disturbance interfered with the management of the convenience store of the victim.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's work by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to I, G, and E;

1. Investigation report (on-site conditions, etc.) and investigation report (related to the unsatisfying circumstances of the criminal implements);

1. Written estimate;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Articles 369(1) and 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following circumstances considered in favor of the reasons for sentencing);

1. Determination on the assertion of the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, such as the observation of protection, community service order, and order to attend lectures.