성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(카메라등이용촬영)
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal that the court below rendered (3 million won in penalty, 40 hours in total, 300,000 won in total, and 40 hours in total) is too unhued and unreasonable.
2. In light of the method of judgment, recording, etc., the crime of this case is not good, and the defendant's failure to receive a letter from the injured party is recognized, but the defendant recognized the facts charged of this case and reflects his mistake, the video taken by the defendant does not contain any criminal records exceeding the same kind of fine, the defendant did not have criminal records exceeding the same kind of punishment, and other conditions of sentencing specified in the records and arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex behavior, environment, family relationship, circumstance after the crime, etc., the prosecutor's assertion is without merit. Thus, the prosecutor's argument is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the prosecutor’s appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition.