beta
(영문) 울산지방법원 2016.02.04 2015고단2856

교통사고처리특례법위반

Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in the duties of driving the Rayon.

On September 1, 2015, the Defendant came to turn to the left at D while driving at the intersection of D three-way intersection from the intersection to the south mountain at the parallel of the parallel between the parallel and the parallel of the parallel.

Since there is a left-hand turn at a non-protective zone, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely driving and preventing accidents by checking closely whether or not a motor vehicle is a motor vehicle in the opposite direction to a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle, and in the case of a straight-down motor vehicle, a driver has a duty of care.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to turn to the left in the opposite direction of the victim E(30) driving car, but did not turn to the left in the opposite direction, and received the part of the victim's left side of the car from the defendant.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim due to the above occupational negligence during the period of up to six months, while suffering from an injury to the victim, such as an external wound, in which there is no open room for treatment between two parties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the accused;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a statement of actual investigation;

1. Medical opinion, and medical certificate;

1. The application of each on-site photograph (the victim's wife is not allowed to express his/her wish not to punish the defendant on behalf of the victim. Thus, even if the victim's wife expresses his/her wish not to punish the defendant, it cannot be deemed that the victim's expression of intent as to whether he/she wishes to punish the defendant in the crime of non-compliance with intent to punish him/her takes effect) applies to the law

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Selection of Punishment, and the Criminal Act.