When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On July 12, 2015, the Defendant interfering with his/her duties: (a) stated that “the victim (“D cafeteria” operated by the victim C in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-gu, would change the victim’s “a fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of

“Is this Chewing arsensium,” on the ground that “Is this arsensium would be why Is this arsensium;

Along with the desire of Chewing, the victim’s restaurant business was interfered with by force for about 15 minutes, such as placing a mountain, exposing, and exposing the table, and harming customers in the restaurant, such as “this Chewing baby”, and placing them on the floor of the restaurant.

2. On July 17, 2015, the Defendant: (a) found the Defendant in violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act around 00:15, 2015, at the 277 YY YY YYY YEA, and appealed against the Defendant arrested in the act of committing the crime for the same reason as the above 1.3, and (b) decided that the police officer on duty was arrested in the act of committing the act of committing the crime of committing the crime, and (c) caused the police officer to drink a high frequency of fluoring, and caused him not to sell the fluoring.

“The police officer was arrested.” “The police officer was arrested.

” 고 따지고 “ 쪽발이 일본 순사 놈들, 개새끼들, 한번 봐주면 될 것을, 개새끼들 좃 같은 새끼들” 이라고 말을 하면서 지구대 출입문을 발로 차고 약 40분 동안 욕설과 고함을 지르는 등 주 취 상태로 관공서인 지구대 내에서 소란을 피웠다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the arrest of flagrant offenders and a written statement showing the main offender;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, Article 3(3)1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, and selection of fines, respectively, for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;