However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 01:10 on November 1, 2014, the Defendant: “D cafeteria(20 years of age)” in the following Kasan-si C, “D cafeteria(D 20 years of age), was fluord in the vicinity and fluoring around the fluor, and was fluorily fluor, a dangerous object in the string of passenger car car car car ties owned by the Defendant, taken off the alinium fluor, and 3-4 times off the inside and outside of the victim, and caused the victim to inflict a bodily injury on the victim, such as the mathing of the mast, in need of approximately four weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. Photographs of damaged parts;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Articles 3(1) and 2(1)3 of the former Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (Amended by Act No. 12896, Dec. 30, 2014); Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 60 (3) of the Juvenile Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order [Scope of Recommendation] In the case of habitual injury, repeated injury, and special injury: category 1 (Habitual Injury, Bodi Bodi Bodi Bodi Bodily Injury), the mitigation area (1 year and six months to six months), the punishment is not imposed (including efforts to recover damage), or considerable damage has been recovered (the decision of sentence] the crime of this case where the defendant sent the victim several times with an Aluminium observation network, which is a dangerous object, and thereby causing an injury that requires approximately four weeks medical treatment to the victim, is very dangerous to the law of the crime of this case and the part and degree of the injury suffered by the victim is very poor.

However, the fact that the defendant recognizes the crime of this case and is against the defendant, the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant, the defendant has no record of criminal punishment, and the age, character, conduct, environment of the defendant.