국가유공자등록일부거부처분취소
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
The reasons why the court of this case, which cited the judgment of the court of first instance, are the same as the part on the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for dismissal or deletion as set forth in the following paragraph (2). Thus, it shall be quoted by Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. The part which is dismissed or deleted, shall be from the second to the second to the seventh end of the judgment of the court of first instance, which shall be as follows.
“In this regard, the Defendant, on October 27, 2014, shall be deemed to have “the instant difference” (hereinafter referred to as “the instant difference”).
A) A person eligible for veteran’s compensation was recognized as a person eligible for veteran’s compensation, on the ground that there is no proximate causal relation with the performance of duties or education and training directly related to national defense, security, etc. (hereinafter “instant disposition”).
(On the other hand, the Defendant rendered a disposition of non-conforming to the requirements for persons who rendered distinguished services to the State and persons eligible for veteran's compensation on the ground that there is no proximate causal relation with military duties with respect to the “slick salt” on the same day.
The plaintiff did not dispute this part in the lawsuit of this case.
(2) "2011.." in the second 8th sentence of the judgment of the court of first instance (2 pages of the briefs dated February 4, 2016), "201." shall be read as "2012."
The difference between "the second 12th st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st
“The instant difference” is referred to as “the instant difference.”
In the first instance judgment, "the second 13th th st th th th th th th th th th th th"
" by striking".
Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.