2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

A. Plaintiff A is Plaintiff B and C’s ancillary, and Defendant Social Welfare Foundation D (hereinafter “Defendant Foundation”) is a legal entity that operates a F Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”), and Defendant E is a doctor affiliated with the department of anesthesia and pain of the Defendant Hospital.

B. On April 2, 2014, where Plaintiff A was enrolled in a high school, the same month in which walking is difficult due to pains after facing the right upper part of the deaf-gu hole where the same school student was on the right upper part.

4. The results of the CT shooting showed that the surrounding area of the right-hand public notice box inserted on January 17, 2013 was cut off.

Therefore, the above plaintiff is the same month.

5. After having transferred to the Defendant hospital and received hospitalized treatment on April 9, 2014, the Defendant hospital was discharged on April 25, 201, and again received hospitalized treatment from April 25, 2014 to May 30, 2014, and from July 23, 2014 to July 31, 2014.

Since then, the above plaintiff continued to appeal to the right high level hospital, and the medical personnel of the defendant hospital continued to perform the pharmacologic treatment and the treatment, etc. according to the opinion that the right-hand sloping disease and multiple converging symptoms are doubtful, but the symptoms of the above plaintiff did not change.

C. Accordingly, from around 09:20 on January 18, 2016 to around 11:30 on the same day under Defendant E’s house, the Defendant hospital’s medical team inserted the relevant diculeculic injection with Plaintiff A (hereinafter “instant surgery”). The Defendant hospital removed the relevant diculicule on January 25, 2016, since the dicule had no effect on the test for one week thereafter.

Plaintiff

A was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital on January 17, 2016 for the above treatment, but discharged on February 1, 2016, and is currently in a state of paralysis, and it is impossible for a person to receive urology due to neutism.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 2 through 4, 15 through 19, 24, 25, and Eul evidence No. 1 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply).