On May 14, 2012, the Defendant issued one promissory note as of August 14, 2012, at the E Co., Ltd. office operated by the victim D in Kimhae-si, via F, to the victim via F, one promissory note number G, par value of 66,00,000, issuer H, and payment date. On the ground that “The vice president I received the settlement in Seoul,” and said bill was false as if the completion of the bill was a de facto bill.

However, in fact, the bill was purchased by paying 3,300,000 won under the name of the person who was named in the name of the beneficiary.

On the same day, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above and exempting the victim from the obligation of KRW 19,211,01,01, and acquired the same amount of financial benefits, and received a promissory note equivalent to KRW 5,566,00 from the face value, and acquired the money by remitting KRW 40 million.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol to J and F

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;