If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The defendant, as the representative director of the (main) C of the fiveth floor in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, was subject to seizure and enforcement of corporeal movables in the above office.

On September 9, 2015, when the enforcement officer D belonging to the Seoul Central District Court was entrusted with the execution of the creditor's shotos at the above office, the defendant seized the above (C) movable properties by the original copy of the decision of seizure of corporeal movables (2015da123131 of the above court, and displayed a seizure indication that stated that the seizure indication was made, the defendant sold them after removing the seizure indication attached to one copy of the seized copy on February 2016, and moved them to the office of the defendant in Seocho-gu Seoul, by removing the seizure indication attached to one copy of the seized copy, and then removing the seizure indication attached to one computer, monitor, and strip.

As a result, the defendant has harmed the effectiveness of the attachment indication that public officials performed in relation to their duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Execution clause;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing attachment report of corporeal movables;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense and Article 140 (1) of the Criminal Act selecting a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;