beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.07.20 2016노3893

교통사고처리특례법위반

Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (2.5 million won in 2.5 million won in dub) is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. In the crime of this case, the defendant, who is a dump truck driver, committed a dump truck driver, received cargo vehicles by the negligence of fump truck driver's fumping the central line and caused the injury of 3 weeks of caution to the victim. The degree of negligence is considerably significant, and the defendant did not agree with the victim, etc., but is disadvantageous, or is against the mistake of the defendant, and the injury suffered by the victim is not excessive.

In full view of the facts and arguments of the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, family relationship, circumstances after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too uneasy and unreasonable, in light of the following factors: (a) support for three minor children; (b) favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the Defendant is being subscribed to a comprehensive insurance (influenite): and (c) other various sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment

The ground for appeal is without merit.

3. The appeal by the public prosecutor on the conclusion of the judgment is without merit and is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.