1. Summary of the facts charged

A. The Defendant, who runs a construction business, is a person who was awarded a contract with D on February 13, 2014 for the construction business of the Etel in the East Sea.

When entering into a contract with F to be supplied with the steel necessary for the above construction from F, the Defendant demanded the guarantee of D, the owner of the building, which is the owner of the building, to enter into the guarantee contract without the consent of D.

Around 09:00 on February 24, 2014, the Defendant prepared a written contract stating that “the price shall be paid within seven days from F Co., Ltd. to C, and the price shall be paid within 90 tons,” using a computer, at the office of the Co., Ltd. located in G at the East Sea, and that “the price shall be paid within seven days,” and that “the above contract shall be exempted from a guarantee with a corporate seal imprint affixed to the above contract because it was an agent at D’s construction site,” and that “the above contract shall be exempted from a guarantee with a corporate seal imprint affixed to the above contract,” although there was no prior consent from H with regard to the guarantee of the above contract.”

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged one copy of the supply contract, which is a private document on the rights and obligations of the victim corporation D.

B. The Defendant’s uttering of the above investigation document

At the time and place stated in the subsection, the FF’s employees J, who knew of the forgery, exercised the forged “long-term supply contract” as if it were a document duly formed.

2. The judgment of this Court

A. The burden of proving the facts charged in a criminal trial is the prosecutor.