If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

1. Around 19:00 on May 19, 2012, the Defendant obstructed the Defendant’s normal restaurant business of the victim D (the victim, 33 years old) by exercising force by exercising force on the part of the Defendant: (a) the Defendant, within a restaurant located in Busan Shipping Daegu, for drinking and drinking alcohol; and (b) the Defendant, while drinking and drinking during the day and drinking; and (c) the Defendant: (a) the Defendant: (a) the Defendant: (b) the Defendant: (a) fluor; (b) fluor; (c) fluor; and (d) fluor; and (b) the Defendant fluor; (b) fluor; and (c) the Defendant fluorororord the Plaintiff’s daily restaurant business for about 20 minutes.

2. Since the injured Defendant interfered with restaurant business in the same manner as in the preceding paragraph, the injured victim D, the owner of the business, referred to as “Saman Saman Saman-si Saman-si,” and inflicted an injury with which the number of days of treatment can not be known, such as “in-house Ma,” and “the victim’s knife off both knife and off the skin.”

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning D police statements;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (a point of interference with business), Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (a point of injury) and the selection of each fine for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;