A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 900,000 and by a fine of KRW 500,000.

The above fine shall not be paid by the Defendants.

On May 16, 2018, from around 20:45 to 21:10 on the same day, the Defendants ordered the safety at the “EM store” located in the building D located in the Ansan-gu operated by the victim C, but became the victim and the Si reserve.

1. Defendant A, at the same time and place as above, failed to calculate the number of the defective cards that Defendant B attempted to calculate, and obstructed the legitimate duties of the victim between approximately twenty-five minutes, i.e., the victim who wants to receive another customer’s calculation, “whether or not it is necessary to calculate, or not it is difficult to do work,” and the victim was able to do so.

2. Defendant B is, on the same date and at the same place as that of paragraph 1, “pos terminal (spos system monitor)” as “spos terminal (spos system monitor)” but such recognition is given.

The victim's hand boomed, "sket boom", boomed, boomed, and interfered with the legitimate duties of the victim for about 25 minutes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant B’s legal statement

1. Application of the witness F and C’s statutory statement legislation;

1. Relevant provisions concerning facts constituting an offense and the Defendants who choose punishment: Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: The sentence shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account all the circumstances indicated in the record, including the following circumstances, for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

Defendant B: The circumstances that most of the crimes are disadvantageous to the recognition of Defendant B: In the case of a large number of customers, the victim suffers a lot of damage.