청구이의
1. The Defendant’s notary public against the Plaintiff, No. 522, Sept. 16, 2014, 2014, prepared by the father of the law firm.
The Plaintiff borrowed KRW 50 million from the Defendant on September 16, 2014 at interest rate of KRW 30% per annum, maturity of payment on March 16, 2015, and prepared a notarial deed for a monetary loan loan contract No. 522, 2014 (hereinafter referred to as “notarial deed of this case”) prepared by a notary public on March 16, 2015. The Defendant did not dispute between the parties that the amount based on the notarial deed of this case was fully repaid.
(However, there is a dispute between the parties only as to whether more than the amount based on the notarial deed of this case has been paid. However, the plaintiff only sought compulsory execution in this case and does not claim the return of more money paid). Therefore, compulsory execution based on the notarial deed of this case should be denied. Thus, the plaintiff's claim is with merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition.