beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.02.22 2017고정1956

상해

Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

The defendant is a person living together with C, and the victim B (57) was in marital relationship with C, and the victim B was in the marital relationship with C, and he was found to have his child and to have been in the work of C, and became a vision for each other.

On September 12, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 18:00, at the front of the fenced point of Gwangju Bank Co., Ltd. located in the center of the Namyang-gun, 59, for the reason that the Defendant was in dispute with B for the said reason, brought the victim’s neck, etc. in hand, and carried the victim’s 14-day medical treatment in a flooding manner.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect B of the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 257 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The part dismissing the public prosecution under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (Defendant B) of the Provisional Payment Order

1. On September 12, 2017, the Defendant committed several assaults against the victim A (64 tax) such as the above criminal facts on the front side of the fenced branch of the Gwangju Bank Co., Ltd. located in 59 in the center of the Namyang-gun, Namyang-gun, the centering around September 12, 2017, against the assault of the victim A (64 tax).

2. The facts charged in the judgment can not be prosecuted against the clearly expressed will of the victim pursuant to Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act as a crime falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act.

On February 22, 2018, the victim, after the prosecution of this case, withdrawn his wish to punish the defendant in this court.

Therefore, the prosecution against the above facts charged is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.