If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

1. The Defendant’s insult, on May 11, 2017, at F restaurants operated by E located in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, about 20:20, after receiving a 112 report at the scene, asked the Defendant’s personal information of the Defendant by the victim H, a police officer affiliated with the G police box, who was dispatched to the site after receiving a 112 report, and asked the Defendant’s personal information.

A. A.I.D. has power

Along with approximately one minute of the “Arrest”, the victim was openly insultingd by taking a bath for the same part.

2. The Defendant damaged the property by putting the victim E-owned market value of 40,000 won on the floor at the time and place specified in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. A simplified statement of the I;

1. The president of the H's accusation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs damaged by property;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 311 of the Criminal Act of the choice of punishment (a point of insult), Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines (a point of destroying property), and the selection of fines (a point of reflection of the accused, and recovery of damage to property, etc.);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The part dismissing a public prosecution under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act against the order of provisional payment

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. On May 11, 2017, at around 20:20 on May 11, 201, the Defendant, on the ground that the F restaurant operated by E in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, was excessively written in the statement of drinking and drinking, and thus, he and she took a vision with employees and the victim C, an employee, who is an employee, of this dogbs, e.g., “this dogbs, e., flacs, and shot of internal death,” thereby openly insulting the victim by taking a bath over two minutes.

B. The Defendant, at the above time and place, was the victim C, who is an employee, to have only five percent per share in the Defendant’s lawsuit.

The defect, the victim's bath, and the loss are the loss.