2. In light of the following circumstances that can be recognized by the records of judgment, the evidence alone presented by the prosecutor sufficient proof that the facts charged in the instant case are beyond a reasonable doubt.

It is difficult to see, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

① The victim appeared as a witness in the court, and “the Defendant testified to the effect at the time of committing the crime,” and the victim testified to the effect that “I am spath and spath,” and spathned directly before the full bench.

According to the testimony and trial contents of the victim, when the defendant gets the back of the victim's back by hand and with a large amount of action so that the sound can be seen as fast as possible (the victim expressed this "Woo Do," and the victim expressed this "Woo Do," and if so, it is likely that the sound was not small at the time of the price, and that the victim's secret attack would be accompanied by the victim's secret attack.

However, among the employees in the vicinity of the situation, there is no person who directly sees the back of the victim when the defendant reaches the back of the victim, and there is no person who leads to sound generated in the process.

② In the process of the Defendant’s attempt to pay a cream to the victim’s telephone, the victim has shown a tendency to seriously exaggeration the situation at the time of the investigation process or trial, such as making an oral statement by drinking, etc., and thus, the credibility of the Defendant appears to be lost.

Therefore, there is no other witness.