도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the prosecutor's appeal is as follows: in this case, since there is a possibility that a witness, etc. may escape from the scene of the accident of the defendant, or cause a new traffic accident due to driving away from the defendant, etc., the court below found the defendant not guilty of the violation of the Road Traffic Act (the measures not to be taken after the accident), there is error
2. The summary of the facts charged of the instant case is as follows: “The Defendant acquired a ordinary car driver’s license of Seoul 1st day in Seoul, and driven a Cone Star Cornex Cor on his own as his duties. On July 26, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around July 16, 2014, at a speed of about 20 km as soon as possible depending on one lane among the two lanes in the direction of the steering market in the direction of the steering market from the view of prisoners of war, such as Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul. When the Defendant changed the lane, the Defendant: (b) notified the Defendant of the direction by hand or direction in advance; and (c) neglected his duty of care to change the lane to the right side of the vehicle; and (d) neglected the vehicle to change the lane to the right side of the vehicle on the right side of the Defendant’s vehicle; and (d) took necessary measures such as repairing or repairing the vehicle on the right side of the damaged vehicle, etc., and (d) immediately destroyed or damaged the vehicle’s or damaged its goods.
In regard to this, the court below shall have a driver, etc. commit a traffic accident in the case of damage to goods due to the traffic, such as driving of a vehicle.