beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.09.06 2017나301450

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. In the first instance trial, the Plaintiff claimed against the Defendants KRW 738,259, and KRW 15,000, respectively. The part of the claim is wholly accepted, and the part of the claim was partially accepted.

Since an appeal has been filed against a part of the part against the plaintiff only, this Court shall decide only on the part of the claim.

2. The Defendants of basic facts were indicted on the following criminal facts by violating the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint injury) and defamation, and received a summary order of KRW 2,00,000 from each of the fines on June 17, 2016 (Seoul District Court Decision 2016Da8183). On January 11, 2017, Defendant C requested formal trial and was sentenced to a judgment of conviction of KRW 1,50,000 for fines, KRW 1,000 for fines, and KRW 1,00,000 for fines (Seoul District Court Decision 2016Da1303, May 31, 2017). The above judgment became final and conclusive due to the withdrawal of the Defendants’ appeal on May 31, 2017.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Defendant C (hereinafter “Defendant C”) and Defendant B (hereinafter “Defendant B”)’s co-principal committed on December 9, 2015, as of December 12:30, 2015, Defendant B discovered the victim A (hereinafter “Plaintiffs”) who was suspected of having in an internal relationship with her husband, from the inside of the entrance door of the 1st floor of the modern department store located in Daegu Jung-gu, 2077, as of December 9, 2015, and was suspected of having in an internal relationship with her husband. The victim’s arms (hereinafter “Plaintiffs”). The victim’s arms were fluored with her hand, and the victim was fluored with her head, followed the victim, and moved the victim’s head to the place between the inner entrance and the entrance, and the victim was fluord with the victim’s her head, and the defendant C, who had been fluordd with the victim’s 2 years, the victim’s pirth of this case’s body.