보험에 관한 소송
1. It is confirmed that the insurance contract entered into between the Plaintiff and the Defendant is invalid.
2. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.
1. Basic facts
A. On October 2, 2007, the Plaintiff and the Defendant concluded an insurance contract indicated in attached Form 1 (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”) with the Defendant as the insured.
B. (1) On March 1, 2008, the Defendant received hospital treatment for 10 days from 54 days from March 1, 2008 to May 9, 2016, as shown in attached Table 2, including the fact that the Defendant received hospital treatment for 10 days from 54 days from 54 days from 54 days from 2008 to 54 days.
(2) The Plaintiff paid insurance money to the Defendant KRW 34,657,270 according to the instant insurance contract.
C. Among the insurance contracts that the defendant as the insured and the insurance contracts whose daily allowances are guaranteed for hospitalization due to disease as the insured, the contents of the insurance contracts at the time of the instant insurance contracts or concluded after the instant insurance contracts and the insurance proceeds that the defendant received are as follows:
(The instant insurance contract, content, and nature of the insurance contract were excluded from different insurance contracts). The entry of the “stock company” in an insurance company’s “stock company” is exempt from all the entry of the insurance company’s “stock company” in the first class life insurance contract day, which is non-life insurance day (won), and is non-life insurance day (won).
Mar. 1, 1996; 30,000 36,90 50,073,370 2 integrated workplace insurance on February 24, 1996; 31,100 (disaster hospitalization) 30,100 ; 30,680 U.S. 15,680 U.S. 20 on April 22, 2013; 30,304 non-payment 4.4 non-payment 10,000 30,000 30,00444. 20,000 10,000 20,000 or 50,000 10,000 or 50,000 30,000,000 30,005,013. 20,005 20,013. 204. 201