However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a manager of the E-Public Notice Host in Bocheon-si, and on September 14, 2015, the Defendant was requested to deduct the slabs kept in the room from the victim F (n, age 18) who was newly directors of the said E-Public Notice on September 14, 2015, and was transferred together to the room scheduled to enter the victim.

Women's Madna

Mada dyp

The term "the victim was flicked with her hand," the victim was flicked with the right chest, was flicked with the right chest, was flicked with the victim's her her senth, was flicked about four times by hand, and her her her son was flicked with the victim's her her son.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 7 (3) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse and Article 298 of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of the relevant criminal facts;

1. Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for mitigation of amount (which has grounds to consider the commission of a crime)

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (to refer to the following conditions of sentencing under Article 51 of the Criminal Act, as stated in the following sentencing):

1. Article 21 (3) and (2) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse;

1. The proviso to Article 49(1) of the Act on the Protection of Juveniles against Sexual Abuse, the proviso to Article 50(1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (the Defendant has no history of sex offense, and the Defendant is likely to recommit a sexual crime in light of the following circumstances as stated in the reasons for sentencing:

It is difficult to conclude that there are other special circumstances in which the personal information of the defendant should not be disclosed or notified in comparison with the benefits and prevention effects expected by the disclosure or notification order and the disadvantages and side effects that the defendant suffers.

The reason for sentencing is that the instant indecent act was committed.