However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

around 22:00 on September 17, 2017, the Defendant heard the horses that the victim C, operated by the victim C, located in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, from the place of “D” restaurant, would change from the place of residence to the place of residence, and the Defendant raised the complaints to the victim, and the victim “the victim was killed here.”

Governance, Chewing or well-known;

This year’s “to see it as “,” and to customers,” is a sprink and sprinked year’s “to see the sprink and to see it from E, the same kind of business.”

The term "domination of verbal abuse, intending to do so, etc." prevents customers from entering a disturbance of about 20 minutes, thereby obstructing the victim's restaurant business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the police statement protocol law to C

1. Relevant Article 314 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence include the fact that the defendant has been punished several times as an act of violence, the fact that the defendant has agreed with the victim, the age, sex, conduct, intelligence and environment of the defendant, relationship with the victim, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc. shall be determined as the same as the order;