2. The fact that the judgment of the defendant led to the confession of criminal facts and reflects on the criminal facts, that the vehicle operated by the defendant is covered by the comprehensive motor vehicle insurance, that the victim agreed to do so in a separate manner with the victim, and that the victim submitted a written application for the correction of the defendant's wife, and that the vehicle should not be transferred to anyone or person of the defendant for the first time and should not be reoffending is favorable to the

However, the instant crime causes a traffic accident while driving a central line while under the influence of alcohol by the Defendant, and the quality of such crime is not good. The Defendant stated that the police officer called up immediately after the instant accident did not drive his vehicle and went away after the accident, and that he did not cause a confusion in the investigation, etc. It is not good to the circumstances after the instant crime was committed. The Defendant’s blood alcohol level at the time of the instant crime was high 0.131%, and the injury suffered by the victim due to the instant accident is not easy due to the following: (a) the instant accident was highly high 0.131%; (b) the injury suffered by the victim due to the instant accident was the brain 5 weeks in need of attention; (c) the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of one million won due to a drunk driving in 2015; and (d) the Defendant’s age, environment, character and conduct, motive of the instant crime, circumstances before and after the instant crime, etc., and all other circumstances that may serve as the conditions for the records and the pleadings in the instant case.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.