(1) The Plaintiff is a company that manufactures plastic language, door mold, etc., and Defendant C (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) is a company that engages in civil and construction work, etc., and Defendant D is a person that engages in creative work, etc. in F’s trade name.

d. The Plaintiff’s price for the goods that had not been supplied to the Defendant Company with the title, door, etc. from April 6, 2016 to December 28, 2016 is equivalent to KRW 1,63,782.

Secondly, the Plaintiff supplied Defendant D with the title and door mold by April 27, 2016 is equivalent to KRW 43,818,01.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1-1, Gap evidence 2-1 and 2-2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the plaintiff's claim against the defendant company

A. According to the above facts, the defendant company is obligated to pay the remaining amount of KRW 1,633,782 to the plaintiff. 2) The defendant company is an individual company operated by the defendant D, and the defendant D agreed to pay KRW 43,818,01 to the defendant company. Thus, the defendant company is jointly and severally with the defendant D, and the defendant company is obligated to pay KRW 43,811 to the plaintiff's 43,818,01 to the plaintiff.

In this regard, even if the defendant company is an individual company operated by the defendant company, as alleged by the plaintiff, the argument that the defendant company is responsible for the defendant company's obligations, and it cannot be recognized that the defendant company is jointly liable for the defendant company's obligations, and there is no evidence to prove that the defendant company agreed to pay the price for the goods to the plaintiff of the defendant company.

Therefore, this part of the plaintiff's assertion is without merit.

B. As to the Defendant Company’s assertion, the Defendant Company from the Plaintiff regarding G 24-generation Lone Corporation in the 24th century.